-
Drawing a Venn diagram: Entanglement Issues
Plectics, by Murray Gellman It is appropriate that plectics refers to entanglement or the lack thereof, since entanglement is a key feature of the way complexity arises out of simplicity, making our subject worth studying. The person above was kind enough to send information held in context of picture link for consideration, to help out…
-
Presence and Entanglement
The equivalence principle(29 DEcember 2005 Wiki) The accuracy of the gamma-ray measurements was typically 1%. The blueshift of a falling photon can be found by assuming it has an equivalent mass based on its frequency E = hf (where h is Planck’s constant) along with E = mc2, a result of special relativity. Such simple…
-
String Theory Displays Golden Ratio Tendency?
Srinivas Ramanujan (1887-1920): Ramanujan was a mathematician so great his name transcends jealousies, the one superlatively great mathematician whom India has produced in the last hundred years. “His leaps of intuition confound mathematicians even today, seven decades after his death. ..the brilliant, self-taught Indian mathematician whose work contains some of the most beautiful ideas in…
-
Decoherence
How to understand this quantum-to-classical transition linking two incompatible descriptions of reality is still a matter of debate among the various interpretations of quantum theory. In any case, one can probe the borderline between the classical and the quantum realm by performing interference experiments with particles of increasing complexity. Of course I am cocnerned about…
-
Paul Dirac and Geometrical Thinking?
Into the Antiworld was originally staged at CERN inside the underground cavern that houses the Delphi experiment, in which collisions between electrons and their antiparticles – positrons – are studied. That setting must have been awe-inspiring, particularly as the show closed. The audience would have been whisked from the wonder and novelty of Dirac’s theory…
-
Improve Classic Clock Tests
I think one had to understand what increasing complexity means in our universe? What relation to time would have been of value here while pointing to the quantum levels?? While there must be some pervasive view overlooking all of our ideals about gravity considerations and bulk perspective, the consistancy of the return too, and resulting…
-
Plectics
Murray Gellman: The name that I propose for our subject is “plectics,” derived, like mathematics, ethics, politics, economics, and so on, from the Greek. Since plektos with no prefix comes from *plek- , but without any commitment to the notion of “once” as in “simple” or to the notion of “together” as in “complex,” the…
-
The Total Field
For me this title above strikes a cord somehow in the struggle and regard, leading in our comprehensions to the extension of the standard model. By bringing gravity into the picture and descibing the graviton teaming in the bulk of expression. The general theory of relativity is as yet incomplete insofar as it has been…
-
Special Lagrangian geometry
Dr. Mark Haskins On a wider class of complex manifolds – the so-called Calabi-Yau manifolds – there is also a natural notion of special Lagrangian geometry. Since the late 1980s these Calabi-Yau manifolds have played a prominent role in developments in High Energy Physics and String Theory. In the late 1990s it was realized that…
-
Microstates and Gravity
Strominger: That was the problem we had to solve. In order to count microstates, you need a microscopic theory. Boltzmann had one–the theory of molecules. We needed a microscopic theory for black holes that had to have three characteristics: One, it had to include quantum mechanics. Two, it obviously had to include gravity, because black…
-
"Lightening," as Strings, Strike?
With a “supersymmetrical realization” capable of being disemminated in the brain? What could have manifested from it’s beginning? To have nature exemplify this greater potential “for new airs to breath life ” into other possibilties of minds constructs “real objects” and “things”? Are the brain matters limited in terms of this new math? A perspective…
