It might sound metaphysical and ominous with the idea that such a rebirth could have become the idea of a reincarnation with all that it could entail in information that is existing for the next round of universal expressions. So no, information is never lost 🙂 Shall we for ever tassel for the Chicken and Egg question or accept cosmologically that the universe is as if the chick and no further questions asked?:)
Maybe you are a good practicing Catholic for what is coming with Easter?? I would never judge any individual for what their religious belief is. But yes, I do believe that such rebirths are part of the process for our improvement, how ever such views allow us to the see the world, it is in these new ways. It is, as if even our own view is an example of the world in which we will see, as to how we are at the center of our own expressions. Not intentionally being self centered, but administrating that such births take place even within us. But that’s just my point of view.
So anyway onto the scientific explanation as I see it.
Penrose’s Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, from one of his Pittsburgh lecture slides in June, 2009. Photo by Bryan W. Roberts
Some things that came to mind are based on the idea of cyclic universe as supposed by Sir Roger Penrose. Questions outside the parameters of the cosmological universe allow for other points of view to emerge as one can surmise as not being blatantly unfair. That such a thing is as to consider “other universes” then, could become possible. I would like to present then that the idea of the current universe is as if counted as speeding up, something within our current universe is contributing. Sean Carroll was looking for that.
To maintain such a balance as Omega (If we triangulate Omega, the universe in which we are in, Omegam(mass)+ Omega(a vacuum), what position geometrically, would our universe hold from the coordinates given?), then is to suggest that speeding up, has components that will help to incite a geometrical presence as to how such a universe is displayed? If so, then at a “quantum level” such contributions are being classically displayed, while forcing views with regard toward powers of ten as to suggest, there is a much wider view here then what you see in the everyday life.
That’s just part of it. So it is with this video that you might find interesting. S James Gates demonstrates a measure of time in the sense that what was historically displayed by scientists of the last hundred years can emerge within as building a systemic picture and language development which is beautiful, while being abstract worthy of considering. This is a good example of how ones view of the world can change from what we had as always looked at the world. You find such abstractness( math structure) but there is indeed a lesson in it.