However, by using “matter/antimatter annihilation”, velocities just below the speed of light could be reached, making it possible to reach the next star in about six years.
While I presented the “break through in propulsion system” used for space travel by explaining the ideas behind Susskind’s “thought experiment.” It is with that thinking, one can go back and re-assess what we had thought about “time travel” and such?
Some say it is like conscience effort of reflection? That we go back to the “memory reservoir (where is it-a space between the neurons?)” a “QFT realization” and drag it back up from the field to focalized surface awareness imaging, as some feature of this “time travel scenarion” currently being talk about in spacetime geometrics as warpage? As “an analogy” of the “negative aspect” of conscience?
What is this Inductive/deductive feature then of consciousness?
What is Toposense? A struggle between “discreteness and continuity?” On “large scale” we get “the jest” I think.
It’s a problem though, when it becomes chaotic and complex. An “entropic” realization. As if “arrow of time” goes forward, then how is it memory can be retrieved? Or that what exists “in” the blackhole can be used to ascertain what is going on inside and adjust for the “gravitational attraction” outside?”
Perplexities of the theoretical mind
Is mind, the “brain organ?” Did “mind” evolve “according to” the brain organ? If this is so, then what new “appendage” is currently being developed now? What “attribute of mind” will define it?
I’m theoretically challenged. 🙂
Or, does mind “evolve” the brain matters? If this is so, then “mind” is ahead of the brain matters? What new appendage is formed depends on the mind’s development?
It’s as if there was another stage “before” the spacetime fabric? 🙂 That the spacetime fabric is “the result.”