Netherworld is often used as a synonym for Underworld.
Okay this may seem like a strange title, but believe me when I say how fascinating that such dynamics in meeting “each other: will allow something to “pop” right out of existence.
Underworld is a region in some religions and in mythologies which is thought to be under the surface of the earth. It could be a place where the souls of the recently departed go, and, in some traditions, it is identified with Hell or the realm of death. In other traditions, however, such as animistic traditions, it could be seen as the place where life appears to have originated from (such as plant life, water, etc.) and a place to which life must return at life’s end, with no negative undertones.
I mean I am not quite sure how this post must materialize, to conclude “non-existence” until it is clear, that such dynamics will allow such a thing to happen, that one could say indeed, they have completed their journey.
Now can I say that this is the process of the universe, I can’t be sure.I know that in the “mediation process” for concluding the experience, such an experience has to come undone. Again this is such a strange thing in my mind that I had to say that “I was the experience” until such a time, that going along with other things in sameness of dynamics, that it was hard at first to see this dynamics in play as being apart from it. I could actually only say enough of this experience to concluded the realization of coming undone. Hmm…
To solidify this until understanding, I relived these things until I saw the last of the tension ebb away to allow “a tension” to become undone. As if such tension “had to exist” until the very bubble that harbored and allowed all of the world of our expediency no longer supported such a viable option as that bubble.
I know this is not such a cute analogy but to get to the essence of the story then it has to be understood that underneath “this experience” is a dynamcial revelation of sorts that hides the equation of such an experience?
You should know then that I see this very schematics of the world as having this nature to it that we may describe reality as something closer to the definition of it’s very existence and that such a attempt at describing nature was to get to the very end of what begins? Imagine arriving at the juxtaposition of such a point?
How are We to Contained Experience?
In mathematics, the Klein bottle ([klaɪ̯n]) is a non-orientable surface, informally, a surface (a two-dimensional manifold) with no identifiable “inner” and “outer” sides. Other related non-orientable objects include the Möbius strip and the real projective plane. Whereas a Möbius strip is a two-dimensional surface with boundary, a Klein bottle has no boundary. (For comparison, a sphere is an orientable surface with no boundary.)
By adding a fourth dimension to the three dimensional space, the self-intersection can be eliminated. Gently push a piece of the tube containing the intersection out of the original three dimensional space. A useful analogy is to consider a self-intersecting curve on the plane; self-intersections can be eliminated by lifting one strand off the plane.
This immersion is useful for visualizing many properties of the Klein bottle. For example, the Klein bottle has no boundary, where the surface stops abruptly, and it is non-orientable, as reflected in the one-sidedness of the immersion.
The geometry was revealing as I tried to encapsulate this point, so as to see where such a description fell away from all that we can contain of the world. That we can truly say we had indeed let go. To imagine then that one’s grip on things became ever tighter, while wishing to let the strength of this while becoming ever stronger to fall away.
“While Gassner was watching television, the natural motion of the Earth must have carried him through a small non-orientable pocket of the universe,” said Boris Harkov, a mathematician at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. “That’s the only reasonable explanation.”
One way to test the orientation of the universe is to hurl a right-handed glove into the air and see if it falls back to Earth as a left-handed glove–if it does, the universe must be non-orientable. Since Gassner’s announcement, physicists have been carrying out such experiments, both outdoors and in Gassner’s TV room, but so far all tests have come back negative. Still, many researchers are optimistic. “I’m confident that the glove will flip soon,” said Chen Xiang, an experimental physicist at Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York. The Klarreich Occasionally
Ultimate realization that what is negative is a positive toward completion.That is how one might define the whole perspective of validation of no longer being negative?
As if one wold realize that such a tension revealed in the Tao, no longer existed in the picture as a demonstration of the Tao now gone.
Now, such a object seemed part of the experience, as to the unfolding, yet in my inadequate understanding how could such a thing be taken down to such a point as to say it no longer existed. How can I say say such a geometry was part of that process while I struggle to define such an action as falling away or reducing it to such a point of nothing?
It’s enough then that one sees “around that point” that the ultimate quest envisions such an “undoing” that we see where the relevance of such a tension can and should no longer exist?
The Experience Most Fitting then ?
As I relayed earlier I experience many things until I understood this undoing, that such reason then to awareness of “what should be” was capsulized in only one example. How shall I say it then that I understood all that befell me to dissolution to show that such a demonstration was complete. I would still be here? That such an equation of resistance could have been imparted not only in the equation, but in the telling of the experience too?
While I show by experience such an example it should be taken that in this example I have changed the name of the person in order to protect our association. Shall I be so forthcoming that only the “object of relation” shall be the only thing identifiable so as to know that this association is very real to me, and only to me by that person’s identification as an experience that is real? Aw….well anyway “more then one” for sure, as to the way in which I use that experience to demonstrate.
It all began, as I noticed a tension in his voice, as he slipped into the realization of something that had happen to him earlier in that day. I was taken to a “good observation point” so that I might admit to seeing what he was seeing. As hard as I looked at first I could not tell what he was so upset about that I tried ever harder to see, that slowly I understood then what he was pointing at. Why such a tension could exist in him and his voice, that such a rectification and adjustment was needed in order to make this right.
As I relay this situation it was apparent at the time of such a demonstration, as to a example that this situation popped up, as such a reason to be demonstrated that to make it right, had to be the undoing of what made it wrong you see. To make the point ever driven home for realization was to demonstrate that such undoing had to rectify the situation of where it began, so of course, all actions taken to get it fixed. Could it have ever been undone?
Well as if I understood why such an experience came frothing to the surface of awareness I thought to conclude this example by what I saw, that it took me by realization that “in turning” to back up, a hand imprint in oil was left on the back of the seat in order for the person to complete the job. A “new point of tension” by not washing their hands, or not covering pristine upholstery that was just purchased, was created.
All of this has to be undone in order for one to say that this experience has popped out of existence you see?
That was how such a demonstration was shown to be reasonable in my mind for such an equation to manifest such a description about that experience that I could say that it was reasonable to me that I had understood.
Was it a good example rests on you to be sure.
Physically, the effect can be interpreted as an object moving from the “false vacuum” (where = 0) to the more stable “true vacuum” (where = v). Gravitationally, it is similar to the more familiar case of moving from the hilltop to the valley. In the case of Higgs field, the transformation is accompanied with a “phase change”, which endows mass to some of the particles
“Quantum Field Theory
In classical physics, empty space is called the vacuum. The classical vacuum is utterly featureless. However, in quantum theory, the vacuum is a much more complex entity. The uncertainty principle allows virtual particles (each corresponding to a quantum field) continually materialize out of the vacuum, propagate for a short time and then vanish. ” http://universe-review.ca/R15-12-QFT.htm#vacuum
“The idea behind the Coleman-De Luccia instanton, discovered in 1987, is that the matter in the early universe is initially in a state known as a false vacuum. A false vacuum is a classically stable excited state which is quantum mechanically unstable.” http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/research/gr/public/qg_qc.html