For Newton the universe lived in an infinite and featureless space.There was no boundary, ad no possibility of conceiving anything outside of it. This was no problem for God, as he was everywhere. For Newton, space was the “sensorium” of God-the medium of his presence in and attachment to the world. The infinity of space was then a necessary reflection of the infinite capacity of God.The Life of the Cosmos By Lee Smolin Oxford University Press; New York, N.Y.: 1997, Page 91-**See Also**: Configuration Space

Can we be through physicality such a place, through which “a point” can be expressed, as the space in which we live?

**Three-dimensional space** is a geometric model of the physical universe in which we live. The three dimensions are commonly called length, width, and depth (or height), although any three directions can be chosen, provided that they do not lie in the same plane.

*In physics and mathematics, a sequence of **n numbers can be understood as a location in **n-dimensional space. When **n = 3, the set of all such locations is called ***3-dimensional Euclidean space**.

I mean the borders with which perspective is guaranteed is to fill, is to which all life evolves around, is the perception that is limited to a defined space given through which that point becomes nothing more then the regurgitation of all their own parameters with which the individual builds their own confines? This is what is funneled into their way of thinking, yet out of complexity, such individuality is using the same system with which one can explain universality? How large is your universe?

I presented the idea of Entheorizing as an example of what can be placed over top of Pascal’s triangle of possible numbered systems so as to be defined “as a funnel of a parameter spaces” complex and chaotic indeed that can be moved down through a point to a defined position?

*Hi Steven,*

*
*Yes Pascal has been of quite interest to me as well.

The Galton Box is a interesting correlation in thinking as to outcome? Some might use mountains and pebbles…others still out comes as numbered systems as to the way in which the world expresses itself.

*I tried abstractly to show that from symmetry(where is this?) has an asymmetrical relation as to the bean, as if, the energy enters into expression at the peak and arrives somewhere at it’s based? Yes pyramidal:)*

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*