Professor Rosalind W. Picard, ScD is founder and director of the Affective Computing research group at the MIT Media Lab, co-director of the Things That Think consortium, and leader of the new and growing Autism & Communication Technology Initiative at MIT. In April 2009 she co-founded Affectiva, Inc., where she serves as chairman and chief scientist.
You have to understand we use matter defined things in order to measure how the brain can manifest certain rythmns to establish correlated focus. Focus levels not just found in sleep time, which can be experience in the day time as well?
Sensor development, helps to direct attention as to how emotion is demonstrated? Skin Conductance while demonstrate to be measured in one sense …I might say that the response in the psychological and physiological consideration may be seen as if the MRI would showing the neurons…. how else would this be measured that does not smack of the auras that one would quickly jump too in thought?
Skin conductance response in regular subjects differs when given fair and unfair offers, respectively. However, psychopaths have been shown to have no difference in skin conductance between fair and unfair offers. This may indicate that the use of lie detectors relying on skin conductivity gives psychopaths an advantage that non-psychopaths do not have in criminal investigations.
The quest for me understanding the method by which discussion evolved with Seth was of interest in regard to EU(emotional units) and UC(units of consciousness). This detailed to me the need for a foundation understanding of how consciousness worked. It’s emergent functionality with expression and remembrance. This is also where Karim Nader comes into the picture.
How would one measure focus levels and share some understanding toward that foundation approach? Gravity? How would one picture a cloud around biological demonstration of consciousness and one could have venture off into the occult. So focus levels become a correspondence to brain wave considerations?
Also the problem with identifying innateness as a parameter given to this life only and the evolutionary course of the souls expression.
“Your BS( belief structure) dictates the frame of reference established for your experience”….not just of the near death question, but life in general? Maybe this is a postulate in itself that can be expanded on? Taken to a irreducible summation then maybe we can go from there?
The only way the reference frame can be changed for an individual is if it is somehow knocked out of its loop. Paradigmatic changes as if concerted require revolutions of course and the idea that observations can play a role is a self indicating permission to individuals to allow themself to move away from what is holding the mind to its continuous loop.
Often the outlook on life changes and it does not again need the NDE experience just to show this is a natural function of “aha” moments and realizations that allow one to expand that potential to see life differently then they always have.
See for example: Fractals and Antennas and The Economy
Fractal Antenna Example
You know the opposition to speaking about things that require a greater perception has been lost in the fact that I have to keep pushing one to realize how absurd the examples are of when you try to sound as if you have it in the bag so to speak. It is just as bad as the perception you keep creating with your smoke, magic, and mirrors. As bad as securing oneself in the fact that what is spoken by the “Great Shermer” will help you as a seated perspective about the grasp you have on reality.
The point about Benoit and Taleb is to show how perception when not used to its full potential fails to see how the basis of perception has emergent properties that affect the paradigmatic frame of reference that one has always held too. With all this talk now I have made comparisons that regardless of the subject show components of what is natural in consciousness as to see that birth and death are really natural things held within our perspectives.
How would you deny the experience of an NDEr in another when this experience resides in oneself as well?