It is a identifying process that with data seems to fulfill a general sense of completion? IN a sense I see that powers of ten quickly surmises us to examine the scale with which exposure reveals the depth of things.
Quickly we are taken to “such levels of perception” that were once deemed as not real. Yet to think such exploratory examines were ever considered theoretical examples and to now have correspondences based on the items of the real world?
I wonder if a layman can write to such venues as to suggest possibly I could have written something actually considered useful and thought provoking?