To model any process that as a BS(Belief System) system, as in Numerical Relativity, is to say that such computerization incorporates such photonic principles as to adhere to some aspect of the discovery of consciousness as a basis of that modelling?
The subsystem toward understanding consciousness is then the realization that such modeling is the outcome of projections into the basis of matter orientations. Intent, as a force has move through such matters so as to gain in matter perspectives?
But if such an entry into such matter projections find significant “scientific value” then it is appropriate to say the understanding that the belief system has become part of the foundational constructive example of our orientations as a consequence? This is what is meant then by “to be lead by science,” as a basic premise of understanding the beginnings of the truth with regard to understanding consciousness?
We build in matter? Numerical relativity is such an example. So where to from here?
Spintronics and orientation perhaps, so as to reveal some correspondence toward understanding the basis of the QGP? This understanding not only with regard to the forward decay chain of this construct, but as a flowing straight through is but to reveal such a path with regard to the use of superconductors and its use in quantum computerization?
So we emulate consciousness you see?
See Also:
Dialogos of Eide 