Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, UKAs you know my name is PlatoPlato(The School of Athens by Raphael:)I have lived on for many years now, in the ideas that are presented in the ideas of R Buckminster Fuller, and with the helping hands of dyes, have demonstrated, the basis of these sounds in balloon configuration worth wondering, as simplices of these higher dimensional realizations.

A Chladni plate consist of a flat sheet of metal, usually circular or square, mounted on a central stalk to a sturdy base. When the plate is oscillating in a particular mode of vibration, the nodes and antinodes set up form a complex but symmetrical pattern over its surface. The positions of these nodes and antinodes can be seen by sprinkling sand upon the plates;

Now you know from the previous post, that I have taken the technical aspects of string theory, and the mathematical formulations, and moved them into a encapsulated state of existence, much as brane theory has done.

I look at this point(3 sphere derivation from Euclid point line plane), on the brane and I wonder indeed, how 1R radius of this point becomes a circle. Indeed, we find this “idea” leaving the brane into a bulk manifestation of information, that we little specks on earth look for in signs of, through our large interferometers called LIGO’s

John Baez:

Ever make a cube out of paper? You draw six square on the paper in a cross-shaped pattern, cut the whole thing out, and then fold it up…. To do this, we take advantage of the fact that the interior angles of 3 squares don’t quite add up to 360 degrees: they only add up to 270 degrees. So if we try to tile the plane with squares in such a way that only 3 meet at each vertex, the pattern naturally “curls up” into the 3rd dimension – and becomes a cube!

The same idea applies to all the other Platonic solids. And we can understand the 4d regular polytopes in the same way!

The Hills of M Theory

The hills are alive with the sound of music
With songs they have sung for a thousand years.
The hills fill my heart with the sound of music
My heart wants to sing every song it hears….

It’s a wonder indeed that we could talk about the spacetime fabric and the higher dimensions that settle themselves into cohesive structures(my solids) for our satisfaction? What nodal points, do we have to wonder about when a string vibrates, and one does not have to wonder to much about the measure of the Q<->Q distance, as something more then the metric field resonates for us?

This higher dimensional value seen in this distance would speak loudly to its possibilities of shape, but it is not easily accepted that we find lattice structures could have ever settled themselves into mass configurations of my solids.

Lenny Susskind must be very proud of this landscape interpretation, as it is shown in the picture above. But the question is, if the spacetime fabric is the place where all these higher dimensions will reveal themselves, then what structure would have been defined in this expression from it’s origination, to what we see today?

Alas, I am taken to the principles of,” Spacetime in String Theory,” by Gary T. Horowitz

If one quantizes a free relativistic (super) string in flat spacetime one finds a infinite tower of modes of increasing mass. Let us assume the string is closed, i.e., topologically a circle

Ah what the heck……I’ll bite….let the skeptics converge in a harmonic convergence:)

Nigel Hitching

Sylvester Surfaces and the B field?

Are you a “gold fish” or a “Ant world person?” Are you a pigeon? Have you sent your vision into the things of nature, to explore it’s potential in other ways?

Rupert Sheldrake The morphic fields of mental activity are not confined to the insides of our heads. They extend far beyond our brain though intention and attention. We are already familiar with the idea of fields extending beyond the material objects in which they are rooted: for example magnetic fields extend beyond the surfaces of magnets; the earth’s gravitational field extends far beyond the surface of the earth, keeping the moon in its orbit; and the fields of a cell phone stretch out far beyond the phone itself. Likewise the fields of our minds extend far beyond our brains.

The Faraday’s, the Gauss’s, the Riemann’s learnt to see in other ways? Does this imply some spooky valuation beyond the confines of the brain’s home?

“The gravitons behave like sound in a metal sheet,” says Dvali. “Hitting the sheet with a hammer creates a sound wave that travels along its surface. But the sound propagation is not exactly two-dimensional as part of the energy is lost into the surrounding air. Near the hammer, the loss of energy is small, but further away, it’s more significant.”

So is it just a brain thingy, or is this “field real?” Some were not so unintelligent to “refute the aether” at one time. For we now understand what exists in the real spacetime valuations, beyond what is held to the brane, and see bulk manifestation, as real and populated. AS a extension, beyond those surfaces.

The Sound of Billiard Balls

Savas Dimopoulos:

Here’s an analogy to understand this: imagine that our universe is a two-dimensional pool table, which you look down on from the third spatial dimension. When the billiard balls collide on the table, they scatter into new trajectories across the surface. But we also hear the click of sound as they impact: that’s collision energy being radiated into a third dimension above and beyond the surface. In this picture, the billiard balls are like protons and neutrons, and the sound wave behaves like the graviton.

Are we exercising the brains ability to get this topo-sense and geometrical revelation beyond straight lines and distances between points?

So what is a Chladni plate?:) helps you to see how sound is of value beyond the confines Faraday’s magnetic field lines, as real effects of that same magnet, and resonant coupling points. Exercising the potential of banging metal, helps the mind point to other places too. Playing pool, does too?:)

Now before I go into this I am thinking also if how “weathered effects and chaos” would have allowed quantum probability valuations (let’s say spintronic idealization to channel) to have been curtailed to a Professor crossing the room. Brane orientation and fermion considerations held, while helping to orientate views further out in the bulk?

This encompasses the generalization in terms of bubble dynamics, or how could any singularity too “inside/out” be of value to that same gravitational collapse, regardless of macro or micro considerations?

So one would have to seen how, Lagrange “points” help to view dynamical situations in relation to the Sun Earth Moon. I would like to have thought of a Chladni plate analogy here, pointing, to a place for consideration of movement of our satellites with less effort. It is a vision of geometrical correlations that such idea could have been artistically imbued.

Resonance

This is a magazine that Clifford drew our attention too, and while looking in the archive I found reference here below that sort of caught my attention.

Brownian Motion Problem: Random Walk and

Beyond ,

I really find this quite interesting from a “artistic point of view”.

While indeed the issue is quite complex in terms of environmental flows and such, this kind of dynamical valuation might seem interesting from the point of view of early plasma-tic conditions, would it not?

Now if such superfluity conditions would arise in the collider developments then, this expression would definitely need to answer the way in which we look at what supersymmetric valuation would have ever resulted in symmetry breaking valuation sought from these bubble dynamics, from the fluid of that early universe.

What constraints would limit you from making such a comparison and the idea of bubbles that form from this bath? To viewing dynamic situations in terms of thermodynamic realization offered from other perspectives. I give some examples shortly. Just know, that gravitational collapse would have signaled a better determination then one how ever discerned, to point to efforts to understand this super-symmetrical valuation. If all gravitational states of collapse are revealed as leading indicators to this supersymmetric valuation, then the idea to me is that this points to a underlying reality that exists in our moments around us.

While Micro-state black-hole would be quick to dissipate, it is equally sufficient to my thinking to see that information release from this “super-symmetrical breaking” would give indications as information in UV indications?

Of course it’s all speculation from the point of the fluid, because we have evidence of this already. So all I am doing is saying that having the stage set, then how would such relations signal new universes?

So from a geometrical standpoint, having been told that there are no physics and geometry below a certain length (is this a quantum gravity assertion since there is no consensus?), this makes it extremely difficult to theoretically deal with how such a issue I am relaying in terms of Brownian motion could have ever spawned those same bubble universes out of such a fluid state.

So my mind is set in this chaotic environment, but indeed, the continuity of all these movements and flows seem disjointed from one perspective, that one point over here, might be different in the way a Gaussian map might reveal of point “p” over there. So we know on the surface, seeing valuation in terms of Gaussian coordinates that we can spell out on the face value of this surface, would have given a ^uv of P a very much different look.

Gaussian Coordinates

We can sum this up as follows: Gauss invented a method for the mathematical treatment of continua in general, in which ?size-relations? (distances between neighboring points) are defined. To every point of a continuum are assigned as many numbers (Gaussian co-ordinates) as the continuum has dimensions. This is done in such a way, that only one meaning can be attached to the assignment, and that numbers (Gaussian co-ordinates) which differ by an indefinitely small amount are assigned to adjacent points. The Gaussian co-ordinate system is a logical generalization of the Cartesian co-ordinate system. It is also applicable to non-Euclidean continua, but only when, with respect to the defined size or distance, small parts of the continuum under consideration behave more nearly like a Euclidean system, the smaller the part of the continuum under our notice.

Now if such bubble dynamics were to be self revealing, such surface measures would give evidentiary features of the shape of this bubble, defining geometrical propensities as a surface valuation. I am thinking here of the “rainbow colors as refractory relevance” that would seem to define heavier color variations over this surface, if using soap bubble as an example.

Plato:

So just to carry on a bit with this point “P” in Gaussian coordinated of frame of UV, what realization exists that we could not find some relevance here in the geometry to have further exploited the mind’s capabilities by venturing into the Wunderkammer of thinking. By association, of Nigel Hitchin’s “B Field manifestations geometries” to realize that although these might be limited to what Jacque is saying , then what value this geometry if we can not see the landscape as something real in time variable measures?

Now you know you could have never come to this “shape” without the birthing process of expansionary values of a new universe right? So of course there is something troubling about chaotic environments, but also the nice fluid forms of expression that would seem to reveal the dynamics of nature in overlaid valuation, of motion.

Having come to a surface valuation of expansionary features such as a measure of the earth in a “time variable mode”, makes much more sense to me having accumulative histories and use of Grace, that we would now say hey, our views of spherical and round earth we live on has a certain new feature about it, that does not seem so pretty. Well, we defined the valuation gravitational over this whole planet and it is encased. So I see it as a bubble defined to it’s mass context and density variations etc.