Before I begin I had to mention the following two entries below that I wanted to do but was short on time.
This recording was produced by converting into audible sounds some of the radar echoes received by Huygens during the last few kilometres of its descent onto Titan. As the probe approaches the ground, both the pitch and intensity increase. Scientists will use intensity of the echoes to speculate about the nature of the surface.
I am following behind on the different posts that I wanted to write. One of them in relation to the descent of a “measure gatherer” (sounds primitive doesn’t it?) and the sound values produced from that “descent on Titan.” Can make it “sound ancient” while current research is of value.
Almost, as if one is a cave dweller blowing dried paint over their hands, could possibly be thinking of fire and rays cast while their own shadows made them think of a sun that can enter the cave, and chains that need to be broken from thinking so circumspect..:)
The second one I wanted to talk about was in relation to Themis and the Aurora Borealis. The labels will hopefully help with my previous research that I had done as well as other perspectives that allowed me to see this sun earth relationship. Quasar has currently dealing with that topic further in “Coronal Mass Ejection” as well and Backreaction entitled, “NASA launch of THEMIS Satellite.“
Anyway on to the essence of this post and why it is troubling to me. Many would not know what goes on in my head as I am currently looking at the relationship of the Bose Nova to the jet productions that issue from such spiralled tendency. Accretion disc and the idea of such spiralling, to a pipe that follows to making anti-matter productions?
See Water in Zero Gravity, by Backreaction
How did this all arise? So you see such an idea of the sphere in a vacuum is a point from which to begin the search for things that were not there before, so we now know that such collisions can indeed produce “new” information?
The action taken, although seems related to what Arivero is saying, and of course I already have much on this in terms of Han Jenny, and the taking of the Chaldni plate to spherical relations. As an experiment with a “balloons and dyes using sound” similar to “sand on that same chaldni plate.”
The Perfect Sphere and Sonoluminence.
Purdue University officials today announced that a second and final internal inquiry has cleared bubble-fusion researcher Rusi Taleyarkhan of all allegations of research misconduct. “I feel vindicated and exonerated,” Taleyarkhan says. “It’s been a pressure cooker for about a year.” But controversy surrounding Taleyarkhan’s work isn’t likely to die down any time soon.
Taleyarkhan is the chief proponent of the controversial notion of sonofusion, which suggests that sound energy can collapse bubbles in a way that yields more energy than was initially put in (ScienceNOW, 4 March 2002). Last year, an article in Nature reported that several of Taleyarkhan’s colleagues at Purdue were upset by their encounters with him, suggesting that he allegedly obstructed their work and tried to stop them from publishing results that contradicted his own.
There has been some contention about the results, but this is far from what I wanted to show in terms of the geometrics involved. Patience as to the energy produced from this interaction of “sound on the surface transferred inside” to cause a spherical collapse.
German researchers have measured the duration and shape of a sonoluminescence pulse for the first time. Sonoluminescence – the emission of light by bubbles of gas trapped in a liquid and excited by sound waves – is one of the most puzzling phenomena in physics. Although first discovered in 1934, physicists have yet to discover the underlying light emitting process.
Seeing the tensorial action on the bubble moving sound inside, I had wondered about how such a collapse could increase the temperatures involved to produce this “super higgs fluid.” Lubos Motl never gave this much thought and I of course am impressionable when it comes to the science mind. I could not shake it.
Ultrasound can produce temperatures as high as those on the surface of the Sun and pressures as great as those at the bottom of the ocean. In some cases, it can also increase chemical reactivities by nearly a millionfold.
So we “assign fluids” as one might the “vacuum in space” to illustrate what we have as our way with these bubbles? These claims have not been fantastical other then what the science had been designed for, yet I am drawn to the schematics and geometrics.
So yes the ways in which the size of the blackhole could all of sudden collapse is critical here, to producing further results in what is required of the new physics? So looking for “such experimental processes” is always part of my resolve to understand the geometrics involved.
Please be patient while I am learning.
See further information in regards to Broken Symmetry.
So the idea here that was troubling was the way in which the symmetry was broken in terms of the fluid flows demonstrated by the Broken Symmetry examples.
My perception is much different here in that the dynamical relation of “the super fluid”, may have it’s correlation in the Navier stokes equations. This is by “insinuation on my part.” How preposterous such a thing to think that the conditions had to be “spelt out first” in order for us to understand the “new physics” beyond the standard model?
The Navier-Stokes equations, named after Claude-Louis Navier and George Gabriel Stokes, are a set of equations that describe the motion of fluid substances such as liquids and gases. These equations establish that changes in momentum in infinitesimal volumes of fluid are simply the product of changes in pressure and dissipative viscous forces (similar to friction) acting inside the fluid. These viscous forces originate in molecular interactions and dictate how viscous a fluid is. Thus, the Navier-Stokes equations are a dynamical statement of the balance of forces acting at any given region of the fluid.
Using the geometrical basis of my thought pattern established as a point in a circle, or a point with “no boundary”, it seems it is very difficult to talk about the universe if one does not include the way in which such dynamicals can perpetuate the energy within this system.
In fact, in the reciprocal language, these tiny circles are getting ever smaller as time goes by, since as R grows, 1/R shrinks. Now we seem to have really gone off the deep end. How can this possibly be true? How can a six-foot tall human being ‘fit’ inside such an unbelievably microscopic universe? How can a speck of a universe be physically identical to the great expanse we view in the heavens above?
(Brian Greene, The Elegant Universe, pages 248-249)
Thus too, the understanding, that if you turn Einstein’s equation E=mc2 inside/out then what had you done? All “matter states” have then been assigned a energy value? Qui! Non?
Layman scratching head while faceless expression of Boltzmann puzzlement takes hold?
How is one suppose to find “a equilibrium” in such a “low entropic state?”
If we were to experimentally challenging any thinking with “relativistic processes” how could they have ever emerged out of the BB? Maybe, it was a “highly symmetric event” for any asymmetry to show itself as “discrete measures” defined in relation to the “energy of probable outcomes?”
Where did such reductionism begin for us to ask about the “cross over?”
We needed high energy perspective to realize that we were still talking about the universe. Are there any other processes within the cosmos that can be taken down to such rejuvenated qualities to new universes being born that while the arrow of time is pointed one way, that the universe itself allowed such expression to continue in the expansion rate, and the speed up?
A Higg’s fluid? Something had to be “happening now” that would dictate?
Forgive me here for my ignorance in face of those better equipped.
So you are looking for “this point” where things cross over? It is highly supersymmetric, yet, we know that such matter states have been detailed and defined as “discrete” asymmetric matter states.
I made a comment above that needed to be looked at again so I am placing it here while it suffers it’s fate in another location. The basis of the argument is an ole one indeed that has long been exchanged by Smolin and Susskind.
Now it is again one of those things that I am trying to make sense of while one could go off in a philosophical direction. While the “facts of the matter” and experimental results dictate my thinking here.
It’s the fault of that ole’ Platonic thinking, and the Pythagorean basis of the universe in expression thingy. The universe is very dynamical geometrically while one debates the essence of inflation and disregards what allows such an expression to bring “other ideas” into the fold. How this “eternal idea” can bring other factors in terms of the speed up into consideration, while one ponders why such a thing is happening?
Neutrino Oscillations? Hmmmm…….
Oscillating flavors The three neutrino mass eigenstates are presumed to be different coherent superpositions of the three flavor eigenstates (ne, nm, and nt) associated with the three charged leptons: the electron, the muon, and the tau. There is good evidence that only two of the three mass eigenstates contribute significantly to ne. In that approximation, one can write
Just another fancy way of looking at CNO and the law of Octaves? 🙂 While some thought space was empty, there were aspects of that space “which was alive” regardless of the asymmetrical realization of the discrete matters?
I’m trying here. You needed a background for it?
The triple alpha process is highly dependent on carbon-12 having a resonance with the same energy as helium-4 and beryllium-8 and before 1952 no such energy level was known. It was astrophysicist Fred Hoyle who used the fact that carbon-12 is so abundant in the universe (and that our existence depends upon it – the Anthropic Principle), as evidence for the existence of the carbon-12 resonance. Fred suggested the idea to nuclear physicist Willy Fowler, who conceded that it was possible that this energy level had been missed in previous work on carbon-12. After a brief undertaking by his research group, they discovered a resonance near to 7.65 Mev.
Now I am not pro or against anything, just trying to make sense of the disparity of such anthropic reasonings. So what processes in Cern reveals such an idea? Muons?
What’s that saying? The devil is in the details 🙂
So we want to define our relationship with the world in some computerized method? It has always been something of a struggle to explain how one may see the world as they lose the focus of distinctive sight and hearing and soon realize that if they are all amalgamated, you might get this idea of the gravitationally inclined atomized in some computerized process? Feelings?:)
You finally learnt something about yourself?
A thought crossed my mind. A fictional story?
It’s interesting what calorimetric measure can do when you are looking at cosmological events. So, the photon becomes descriptive in itself?
Of course speaking of Glast here. Building alliances?
You are working “to set” the course of events? So we have this description then of the universe and it’s “phase transitions.” It’s behind the “value of the photon in it’s description and escape velocity” and it’s value also “gravitationally linked?”
So technology now stops the photon in flight? We can then “colour our views with the gravitationally inclined?”:) A “philosophical take” on new computerized development with feeling?
The leading computer technologies here is not to diverge from what I moved too in terms of understanding the human condition. This is very important to me, and includes not only our biological functioning, but our resulting affect from the physiological one as well.
So while “you think” I hope to chart the colours spectrally induced oscillatory universe from the “photon stop over” and subsequent information held in that abeyance. Sure it’s a story of fiction right now, but in time I would like to see this connection to reality.
It may only rest at this time in conceptual framework that was constructed from what was available in the physics and science at our disposal, while I had to move forward slowly.
It was important to understand why there would be such divergences in perspective and how these would be lined up? Some of course did not want to take the time, but it was important to me to understand the “philosophical position” taken.
One could just as well venture to the condense matter theorist and said, what building blocks shall we use? One should not think the “history of Platonism” without some “other influences” to consider. Least you assign it to a “another particular subject” in it’s present incarnation? An Oscillatory String Universe?
So the evolution here is much more then the “circumspect of the biological function,” but may possible include other things that have not been considered?
Physiologically, the “biological function” had some other relation? So abstract that I assigned the photon? So I said “feelings,” while Einstein might assigned them to a “short or long time” considering his state of mind? 🙂
More thought of course here on the “fictional presentation” submitted previous. As a layman I have a problem in that regard. 🙂
So no one knows how to combine thermodynamics and general relativity? Hmmm….Boltzmann puzzle..hmmmmm…and I slowly drift off in thought.
Our work is about comparing the data we collect in the STAR detector with modern calculations, so that we can write down equations on paper that exactly describe how the quark-gluon plasma behaves,” says Jerome Lauret from Brookhaven National Laboratory. “One of the most important assumptions we’ve made is that, for very intense collisions, the quark-gluon plasma behaves according to hydrodynamic calculations in which the matter is like a liquid that flows with no viscosity whatsoever.“
How does relativity ever arise out of such a situation? If “tunnelling was to occur” where would it occur, and where would “this equilibrium” find comparative Lagrangian relations in the universe? These perspectives are leading to what we see in the WMAP polarization patterns?
Are there not “comparative features” that allows for the low entropic states, within the existing universe? Allows us to return to those same entropic states in their respective regions, while “feeding” the universe?
You had to look for the conditions that would be similar would you not? And “supporting evidence” to explain the current universe speeding up. These conditions would have to support that contention.
I am holding off producing any new posts until I can bring the discussion to a suitable ending where Lee Smolin admits the ideas are not yet completed in terms of of our understanding of the landscape?
Clifford has a good humour post about real estate in the extra dimensions. Of course you had to follow other discourses here to understand how one may view what is “current in the thinking?”
This “balance in perspective” is not just one or the other but on how such perspective is formed around it. So on the one hand you have this Anthropic approach in string theory, and then you have the “philosophical differences on the other?”
Your trying to explain it and in so doing revealing the train of thought that was established. One does not disavow the road leading to the physics established of course, and no where is this intentional on differing perspectives
Lee Smolin: “Here is a metaphor due to Eric Weinstein that I would have put in the book had I heard it before. Let us take a different twist on the landscape of theories and consider the landscape of possible ideas about post standard model or quantum gravity physics that have been proposed. Height is proportional to the number of things the theory gets right. Since we don’t have a convincing case for the right theory yet, that is a high peak somewhere off in the distance. The existing approaches are hills of various heights that may or may not be connected, across some ridges and high valleys to the real peak. We assume the landscape is covered by fog so we can’t see where the real peak is, we can only feel around and detect slopes and local maxima.