Don does explain things clearly in his book with the paper clip example. But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference. This sort of question should consider the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.The Pe Sla
Don does explain things clearly in his book with the paper clip example. But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference. This sort of question should consider the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.The Pe Sla
ThePeSla said:But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference.Can you show this, in "the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.?Best,
ThePeSla said:But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference.Can you show this, in \”the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.?Best,
7 responses to “Antimatter”
Note the TIME!
Hi Ulla,Okay, your 12:38? Changed automatic posting time so it is different now. Is the axiom of the small "i" that you might be referring?Best,
Hi Ulla,Okay, your 12:38? Changed automatic posting time so it is different now. Is the axiom of the small \”i\” that you might be referring?Best,
Don does explain things clearly in his book with the paper clip example. But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference. This sort of question should consider the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.The Pe Sla
Don does explain things clearly in his book with the paper clip example. But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference. This sort of question should consider the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.The Pe Sla
ThePeSla said:But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference.Can you show this, in "the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.?Best,
ThePeSla said:But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference.Can you show this, in \”the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.?Best,