Antimatter

See: Antimatter 101

This entry was posted in Dirac, Don Lincoln and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Antimatter

  1. Ulla says:

    Note the TIME!

  2. Plato Hagel says:

    Hi Ulla,Okay, your 12:38? Changed automatic posting time so it is different now. Is the axiom of the small "i" that you might be referring?Best,

  3. PlatoHagel says:

    Hi Ulla,Okay, your 12:38? Changed automatic posting time so it is different now. Is the axiom of the small \”i\” that you might be referring?Best,

  4. ThePeSla says:

    Don does explain things clearly in his book with the paper clip example. But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference. This sort of question should consider the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.The Pe Sla

  5. Don does explain things clearly in his book with the paper clip example. But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference. This sort of question should consider the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.The Pe Sla

  6. Plato Hagel says:

    ThePeSla said:But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference.Can you show this, in "the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.?Best,

  7. PlatoHagel says:

    ThePeSla said:But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference.Can you show this, in \”the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.?Best,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s