7 Responses to Antimatter

1. Ulla says:

   May 17, 2012 at 7:38 am

   Note the TIME!

   LikeLike

   Reply
2. Plato Hagel says:

   May 17, 2012 at 11:59 am

   Hi Ulla,Okay, your 12:38? Changed automatic posting time so it is different now. Is the axiom of the small "i" that you might be referring?Best,

   LikeLike

   Reply
3. PlatoHagel says:

   May 17, 2012 at 11:59 am

   Hi Ulla,Okay, your 12:38? Changed automatic posting time so it is different now. Is the axiom of the small \”i\” that you might be referring?Best,

   LikeLike

   Reply
4. ThePeSla says:

   May 17, 2012 at 12:43 pm

   Don does explain things clearly in his book with the paper clip example. But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference. This sort of question should consider the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.The Pe Sla

   LikeLike

   Reply
5. L. Edgar Otto says:

   May 17, 2012 at 12:43 pm

   Don does explain things clearly in his book with the paper clip example. But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference. This sort of question should consider the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.The Pe Sla

   LikeLike

   Reply
6. Plato Hagel says:

   May 17, 2012 at 1:07 pm

   ThePeSla said:But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference.Can you show this, in "the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.?Best,

   LikeLike

   Reply
7. PlatoHagel says:

   May 17, 2012 at 1:07 pm

   ThePeSla said:But he is wrong to say no one understands this small +1 difference.Can you show this, in \”the quantum relativity of 1929 in the Fundamental Theory of Eddington as well as of Dirac.?Best,

   LikeLike

   Reply