Category Archives: Quantum Gravity

Inverse Square Law, Sound

Posted on October 30, 2005 by PlatoHagel

Acoustic Physics Of course you must remember, that I was influence by the Triangle man, and the idea of sound valuation in the determinatins of how we see differently. While complex math is the desired result of all the efforts … Continue reading →

Posted in Brian Greene, Einstein, Game Theory, General Relativity, geometries, Gravity, Inverse Square Law, Photon, planck, Quantum Gravity, Smolin, Sound, Standard model, String Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Objective Truth?

Posted on October 28, 2005 by PlatoHagel

Mark: you can tell has a real thirst to get her mind around the issues, and who isn’t looking for a sound bite to take the place of a complicated story There is no doubt in my mind that KC … Continue reading →

Posted in Aristotelean Arche, Brian Greene, Chaldni, Einstein, geometries, Gravity, Induction, Photon, Quantum Gravity, Raphael, Signatore, Smolin, Sound, String Theory, Timaeus | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Improve Classic Clock Tests

Posted on October 26, 2005 by PlatoHagel

I think one had to understand what increasing complexity means in our universe? What relation to time would have been of value here while pointing to the quantum levels?? While there must be some pervasive view overlooking all of our … Continue reading →

Posted in Complexity, Einstein, Graviton, Gravity, M Theory, Particles, Quantum Gravity, Supersymmetry, Symmetry, Symmetry Breaking | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What are those Quantum Microstates

Posted on October 18, 2005 by PlatoHagel

Now two points occupy my mind that hold questions as to what and how such counting can be done in terms of geometric propensity, that would allow these geometries into topological states. First point is: Lubos Motl said: We need … Continue reading →

Posted in Black Holes, Boltzmann, Branes, Collision, Entropy, General Relativity, geometries, Gravity, Laughlin, M Theory, Microscopic Blackholes, Microstate Blackholes, Peter Steinberg, planck, Quantum Gravity, String Theory, Supersymmetry, Symmetry, Symmetry Breaking | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Some Distant Bounding Surface

Posted on October 11, 2005 by PlatoHagel

I mean when I referred to fifth dimensional views you know that the computer screen includes not only it’s functionability in relation to science, but adds that bit of extended flavour to model construction we call imaging right? a) Compactifying … Continue reading →

Posted in Black Holes, Branes, Brian Greene, Compactification, Cosmic Strings, Cosmology, Dimension, General Relativity, Gravity, imagery, Intuition, Lisa Randall, Mathematics, Membrane, Quantum Gravity, String Theory, Sun, Symmetry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Projective Geometries

Posted on October 7, 2005 by PlatoHagel

Action at a Distance Now ths statement might seem counterproductive to the ideas of projective geometry but please bear with me. In physics, action at a distance is the interaction of two objects which are separated in space with no … Continue reading →

Posted in Concepts, Dirac, Einstein, Entanglement, Euclid, geometries, Glast, Gluon, Gravity, John Venn, M Theory, Mathematics, Particles, Perfect Fluid, Phase Transitions, Photon, planck, Projective Geometry, Quantum Gravity, Quark Gluon PLasma, Smolin, Strange Matter, Symmetry, Symmetry Breaking, Venn | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Science and the Mind: Sir Roger Penrose

Posted on October 7, 2005 by PlatoHagel

Above picture, belongs to this article and titled above, of frames that Sir Roger Penrose wrote in 1999. Roger Penrose, a professor of mathematics at the University of Oxford in England, pursues an active interest in recreational math which he … Continue reading →

Posted in General Relativity, geometries, Gravity, M Theory, Mathematics, Quantum Gravity, Sir Roger Penrose, Twistor Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Succession of thinking

Posted on October 1, 2005 by PlatoHagel

How far indeed the the imagination can be taken to see such processes enveloped in how we percieve these changes all around us. Why is gravity so weak, here and now. I have jumped ahead but will lead into it … Continue reading →

Posted in Brian Greene, dark energy, dark matter, Dimension, Dirac, Earth, Einstein, General Relativity, Gravity, imagery, Imagery dimension, Lisa Randall, M Theory, Quantum Gravity, Smolin, Time Travel | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Total Field

Posted on September 24, 2005 by PlatoHagel

For me this title above strikes a cord somehow in the struggle and regard, leading in our comprehensions to the extension of the standard model. By bringing gravity into the picture and descibing the graviton teaming in the bulk of … Continue reading →

Posted in astronomy, Complexity, Earth, Einstein, General Relativity, Glast, Grace, Grace Satellite, Graviton, Gravity, Inverse Square Law, Liminocentric, Lisa Randall, M Theory, Quantum Gravity, Standard model, Symmetry, Symmetry Breaking, Time Variable Measure | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

CFT and the Tomato Soup Can

Posted on September 15, 2005 by PlatoHagel

As always, the layman trying to develope the mathematical views?:) Greg Kuperberg on Sep 15th, 2005 at 12:11 pm Conformal maps of the Earth are a great introduction to complex analysis. If you identify the Earth with the Riemann sphere, … Continue reading →

Posted in Branes, Dimension, Earth, Einstein, General Relativity, Grace, Grace Satellite, Gravity, Kaluza, Loop Quantum, Mathematics, Quantum Gravity, Stephen Hawking, String Theory, Tomato Soup | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment