Problem solvers have a way of getting to the heart of the issues, and unfortunately when ones engages competent minds like Peter Woit in the world? Whose sign post is,”anti-string with no explanation“? This is simple in the minds of the general public? It then becomes a rant, without a substantial basis? Why? Because he had no platform with which to refute?
So this attempt was fruitless, in wondering why strings should not be.
What I did find viable in looking for myself, is finding out where strings applicable features pervaded and what they were describing. Both bottum up and top down have to find approaches that emerge from a place that asks us to map this progress, and there is only one place that allows me to understand this operation.
The spectrum.
When you look at Glast operations this idealization of using the spectrum in cosmological discernation, helped to clarify why the move of strings to a cosmological operation platform was necessary from a experimental and scientific undertanding. Why was this move important?
It had to do with the amounts of energy needed to explore the principles of reductionism? How could we extend reductionism to a cosmological question about the origins of our beginning? There were no limitations as to the question of the energy that could be displayed for us all to wonder on that cosmological pallete, and here Relativity Ruled.
While complexity, asks us about the means of what is established in the forms, stands for us in our observations, as existing? Many people feel safe in what they can see?
I looked for comparative features. Like how ideas could emerge and as a good example of what math could issue from the minds of those whose good observation could speak about natures manfestations.
How good are the observatory minds of mathematicians? That would systematically describe for us this idealization of quantum reality and Relativity to join in a way that makes sense?
Macroscopic and microcosmo perceptions joined?
You say Time? Julian Barbour wants to do away with Time? Yet his goal is the same? He calls Time a human construct? What isn’taside from everythng else that we don’t see? Science reveals a deeper truth?
Killing Time
Barbour posits that time is, in fact, an illusion – a measure imposed on the world by humanity. He explains this with the concept of a ‘now’, which he describes as a snapshot in time – a completely frozen, self-contained instant (much like a Polaroid photograph). Time is simply the measure of the space between two separate and unrelated ‘nows.’
BarryTo offer that I am an engineer and a sculpture with a carear of problem solving. To offer that making me understand the final solution is to achieve making it clear to anyone.
I am somewhat like a philosopsher as you are, minus, the engineering, yet I am quite capable of peering past the veil that good minds construct.
In the end, what is taken with you might be the realization that of all the thought forms we have estanblished and created. The illusion that we move through, hides a deeper truth, and we were emersed within it the whole time. Science, verified the anomalies that we saw?
How much power then could we grant the mind who escapes this realization, to find that all the thoughts that have ever existed, were weighted with the gravity that held us to earth? That the forms, revealled a deeper realization of their beginnings?
As the temperature cooled, the solification was final and so was the idealization that manifested from the idea.
When is a pipe a pipe? Is a question about what supergravity reveals in the forms manifestation. Crystalization. What pattern emerges?
Betrayal of Images” by Rene Magritte. 1929 painting on which is written “This is not a Pipe”
Yet probablistic in nature, how could such things arrange themselves as they have?
There is a deeper question here about the reality. If the idea is born in mind how would it not burn up, comparative to the beginning of our universe? Yet nature has supplied a good analogy of bubbles that form, rise to the surface, and this could have been information that arose from the fifth dimension? It all arose form the mind of the subconsious? It was always closer to the source. Why Ramanujan and Einsteins note taking in the subtle realms help to spur the incubation of reality to a deepr level of questions.
People might say indeed, that this departure point from the sane world of forms, is the moving further into the illusions? But if we cannot find a way to free ourselves, then surely, one will accept the consequences of there reality, as they take it with them?:)
Dialogos of Eide 
One of the most dramatic recent results in string theory is the derivation of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula for black holes obtained by counting the microscopic string states which form a black hole. Bekenstein noted that black holes obey an “area law”, dM = K dA, where ‘A’ is the area of the event horizon and ‘K’ is a constant of proportionality. Since the total mass ‘M’ of a black hole is just its rest energy, Bekenstein realized that this is similar to the thermodynamic law for entropy, dE = T dS. Hawking later performed a semiclassical calculation to show that the temperature of a black hole is given by T = 4 k [where k is a constant called the “surface gravity”]. Therefore the entropy of a black hole should be written as S = A/4.
LikeLike
One of the most dramatic recent results in string theory is the derivation of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula for black holes obtained by counting the microscopic string states which form a black hole. Bekenstein noted that black holes obey an \”area law\”, dM = K dA, where \’A\’ is the area of the event horizon and \’K\’ is a constant of proportionality. Since the total mass \’M\’ of a black hole is just its rest energy, Bekenstein realized that this is similar to the thermodynamic law for entropy, dE = T dS. Hawking later performed a semiclassical calculation to show that the temperature of a black hole is given by T = 4 k [where k is a constant called the \”surface gravity\”]. Therefore the entropy of a black hole should be written as S = A/4.
LikeLike
Barry,A photon is massless, as is a graviton. I believe this to be the case and and you can research for verification.When you think of photon(a representatve of electromagnetc waves) over spacetime fabric any mass impression, the photon will follow this curve in the spacetime. If itr is extreme curvature as in the blackhole the distance travelled will be very short, to not at all? Gravitons as representative of gravitational waves reveal the nature of the spacetime fabric. Gravitons are free to roam in the bulk. Their concentration will reveal extreme cases of curvature, like blackholes.Photons are held to the branes. Any event ithe early universe wil reveal tha nature of the event and cannot separate itself from it. The gravity waves produced can. The information gathered in LIGO is considered in context of what those events release in terms of gravitational waves. The gravitons wil release specific informtaion in the structural anaysis of that event, although, not held to it like the photon.
LikeLike
Barry,A photon is massless, as is a graviton. I believe this to be the case and and you can research for verification.When you think of photon(a representatve of electromagnetc waves) over spacetime fabric any mass impression, the photon will follow this curve in the spacetime. If itr is extreme curvature as in the blackhole the distance travelled will be very short, to not at all? Gravitons as representative of gravitational waves reveal the nature of the spacetime fabric. Gravitons are free to roam in the bulk. Their concentration will reveal extreme cases of curvature, like blackholes.Photons are held to the branes. Any event ithe early universe wil reveal tha nature of the event and cannot separate itself from it. The gravity waves produced can. The information gathered in LIGO is considered in context of what those events release in terms of gravitational waves. The gravitons wil release specific informtaion in the structural anaysis of that event, although, not held to it like the photon.
LikeLike
Hello SolBetween meeting obligations I have been giving myself a crash course in quantum mechanics. While one could spend a lifetime at this I am seeking enough understanding to look for patterns. While a free quark is not observed, they satisfy the energy distribution requirements, to balance the symmetry breaking equations. While quarks are an act of faith it is one grounded in math derived from solid observation of resultant components. The distrubuted components at 19gev are expected to include gravity. The uknowns can only be determined by testing to failure (symmetry breaking). While we do not yet have high enough energy collisions to achieve this ther might be another way to look at it. Just as it would be very revealing to examine the behavior of a single photon, consider if we could develop a sensitive enough way to measure a single nuclear reaction. There mighr be some benefit in comparing differing fission reactions to those of fusion reactions. If one could determine the energies contributed by the distributed componants, the remainder energy might yield some clues to gravity. Any modal building on this would have to arise from how dynamic space-time is. Maybe this eludes us because because the SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1)components that we understand emerge from the higgs field, while gravity emerges from the particles that exhibit the higgs field, as a property. While we do not yet have the technology to reveal this, at least we know where to look. Have I simply stated the obvious? Have I simply lost the path?Our model builds on a big bang erupting into a space-time already in existance. From what I read of current big bang theory the pre big bang singularity is defined as a single particle occupying all of space, implying that space-time is created at the same time and expands with mass.If space-time expands with mass then we would expect gravity to change radicly with time. While gravity does change with time I suspect that the changes are not large enough to exceed those expected from large mass/energy concentrations expanding into less dense configurations within an existing space-time. What I am getting at here is that our current SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) models build on one type of singularity. The space-time model we have discussed may require changes to the standerd model that speaks to this difference.I do not find this inconsistant because I read a current definition of a black hole as a singularity that occupies no space but does exist in all time. I find this definition to be faulty in that just after big bang it should be found that no black holes yet existed. Time in any conceivable definition existed before black holes.In the singularity expanding with space-time model I would expect to find galaxies to the very edges of space-time. Looking out into this universe I would expect to find very little dark in space as some galaxy would be found at every spot. In the singularity that expands within a larger space-time I would expect for mass to appear finite and for dark space to have scattered galaxies which is what we observe.The bottom line of this is that our current gravity models may need to be adjusted to fit the universe observed, and not the one we thought to exist.Perhaps someone with more knowledge of quantum mechanics will be willing to build on our model. I will continue to educate myself on quantum mechanics, and consider that I have a long way to go. Perhaps I have just gotton off the path?your thoughts?
LikeLike
To sum my thinking at this point.Gravitons are free to roam the bulk because space-time was pre-existant. Photons are restricted to the region where mass/energy has caused distortions because the higg’s field emerges as a function of distortion and only exhibits there strongly. No distortion, no higg’s field. Gravity changes with time, but only by a minimal amount.In consideration of this SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) may need to be modified, or simply placed in the correct context.
LikeLike
Another thoughtDark matter does not have to bond to space time to fit this model. It could end up as a dimensional boundary surrounding space-time. With each cycle of a universe, slightly more dark matter moves past the boundary of surface tension. Physical laws may change slightly with each cycle as space-time to dark matter ratios change. I look forward to your thoughts on these subjects.
LikeLike
Hi Barry,There are two articles that I wnated to put forward here to help orientate ones thinking in terms of a measure.Searching for Changes in the Fine-Structure Constant Using Atomic Clocksand the experiments that define Lorentz and CPT symmetry breaking and how they would test this.G -> H -> … -> SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) -> SU(3) x U(1). Here, each arrow represents a symmetry breaking phase transition where matter changes form and the groups – G, H, SU(3), etc. – represent the different types of matter, specifically the symmetries that the matter exhibits and they are associated with the different fundamental forces of natureU(1) =electromagnetism. If you look at early event in universe creation these phase changes-> would amount to speciifc times in the universe’s unfoldment. Look at standard model construction and the graph I posted for you about the question mark. Unification of all forces would be including grvaity as the grvaiton being a force carier would add to this standard model and make it complete. The negy valuation here was given and you showed this.
LikeLike
Hi Barry,There are two articles that I wnated to put forward here to help orientate ones thinking in terms of a measure.Searching for Changes in the Fine-Structure Constant Using Atomic Clocksand the experiments that define Lorentz and CPT symmetry breaking and how they would test this.G -> H -> … -> SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) -> SU(3) x U(1). Here, each arrow represents a symmetry breaking phase transition where matter changes form and the groups – G, H, SU(3), etc. – represent the different types of matter, specifically the symmetries that the matter exhibits and they are associated with the different fundamental forces of natureU(1) =electromagnetism. If you look at early event in universe creation these phase changes-> would amount to speciifc times in the universe\’s unfoldment. Look at standard model construction and the graph I posted for you about the question mark. Unification of all forces would be including grvaity as the grvaiton being a force carier would add to this standard model and make it complete. The negy valuation here was given and you showed this.
LikeLike
Hello SolA question you asked earlier, that I now feel may be worth answering.What do we call this model?Any suggestions?regards
LikeLike
Another thoughtDoes our model predict that a black hole creates a local maximum in the Higg’s field. At maximum flux density no information energy can be transferred? Symmetry broken and dark matter is the resultant component?
LikeLike
What shall we call this?We can sum this up as follows: Gauss invented a method for the mathematical treatment of continua in general, in which ” size-relations ” (” distances ” between neighbouring points) are defined. To every point of a continuum are assigned as many numbers (Gaussian coordinates) as the continuum has dimensions. This is done in such a way, that only one meaning can be attached to the assignment, and that numbers (Gaussian coordinates) which differ by an indefinitely small amount are assigned to adjacent points. The Gaussian coordinate system is a logical generalisation of the Cartesian co-ordinate system. It is also applicable to non-Euclidean continua, but only when, with respect to the defined “size” or “distance,” small parts of the continuum under consideration behave more nearly like a Euclidean system, the smaller the part of the continuum under our notice.In looking back towards maxwells equation and let there be light, certain idealizations became significant to me when I understood the move from eucldiean to non euclidean views. Gauss as a teacher of Reimann was instrumental in the geometrical interpretions that were lead into GR. Gauss was very happy in hearing his student speak.This hallmark signature leaving the fifth postulate, understanding Giralamo Sacherri, and the new world reveallled in dimensinal analysis, is directly related to that missing energy( read my latest entry article called the same.But now having gone in to the dynamical nature of quantum mechanics what geometry/topology would serve us well, to talk about continuos things without tearing, and this is where topologcial understanding make themselves known(use of genus figures and string amplitutdes expressed in feynman’spath integral designs. Understanding strings then from a quantum mechancal understanding, the relationship to topological forms we see where such Genus figures now become part of the relationship of bubble technologies in the vacuum interpretaions. I am not altogther sure I am being consistent here in alluding to the bubble tehnolgies , but having moved beyond the 10 dimensions of string theory to M theory this culmination is sought in our views of bubble formations in that early universe? there is supersymmetricla realizations when see in Andrey Kravstovs anmation of the square and the distrbution of that energy all of a sudden becoming cosmics strings? I would need corrections here for sure. But I parallel the name of this perspective as a leap in what happened with gaussian coordiante understandng and the understanding of the metric. QQ measures reveal these interesting set of circumstance for us, and help us dee the significance of the gravitons presence in the bulk and what this energy is saying about it’s congregation there. The dynamical nature of these curvatures in a quantum mechanical condition would be interesting in terms of quanum geometry.
LikeLike
What shall we call this?We can sum this up as follows: Gauss invented a method for the mathematical treatment of continua in general, in which \” size-relations \” (\” distances \” between neighbouring points) are defined. To every point of a continuum are assigned as many numbers (Gaussian coordinates) as the continuum has dimensions. This is done in such a way, that only one meaning can be attached to the assignment, and that numbers (Gaussian coordinates) which differ by an indefinitely small amount are assigned to adjacent points. The Gaussian coordinate system is a logical generalisation of the Cartesian co-ordinate system. It is also applicable to non-Euclidean continua, but only when, with respect to the defined \”size\” or \”distance,\” small parts of the continuum under consideration behave more nearly like a Euclidean system, the smaller the part of the continuum under our notice.In looking back towards maxwells equation and let there be light, certain idealizations became significant to me when I understood the move from eucldiean to non euclidean views. Gauss as a teacher of Reimann was instrumental in the geometrical interpretions that were lead into GR. Gauss was very happy in hearing his student speak.This hallmark signature leaving the fifth postulate, understanding Giralamo Sacherri, and the new world reveallled in dimensinal analysis, is directly related to that missing energy( read my latest entry article called the same.But now having gone in to the dynamical nature of quantum mechanics what geometry/topology would serve us well, to talk about continuos things without tearing, and this is where topologcial understanding make themselves known(use of genus figures and string amplitutdes expressed in feynman\’spath integral designs. Understanding strings then from a quantum mechancal understanding, the relationship to topological forms we see where such Genus figures now become part of the relationship of bubble technologies in the vacuum interpretaions. I am not altogther sure I am being consistent here in alluding to the bubble tehnolgies , but having moved beyond the 10 dimensions of string theory to M theory this culmination is sought in our views of bubble formations in that early universe? there is supersymmetricla realizations when see in Andrey Kravstovs anmation of the square and the distrbution of that energy all of a sudden becoming cosmics strings? I would need corrections here for sure. But I parallel the name of this perspective as a leap in what happened with gaussian coordiante understandng and the understanding of the metric. QQ measures reveal these interesting set of circumstance for us, and help us dee the significance of the gravitons presence in the bulk and what this energy is saying about it\’s congregation there. The dynamical nature of these curvatures in a quantum mechanical condition would be interesting in terms of quanum geometry.
LikeLike
Does our model bring anything new to the elephant? I realize that we are building on all that has come before. Specificly I refer to space-time as pre-existing and that that the end theme does not require divergence or convergence to be cyclic.
LikeLike
What if Hawking radiation is mediated by another metric, such as higg’s field saturation that shuts down quark information. Then the only space-time componant breaking symmetry is compression. All mass/energy would present as particles with no electroweak components. Thermodynamics approaching a limit. The only thing getting out of here are particles of certain size with all higg’s field active componants converted to particles. Any preserved symmetry would emerge as particles that must fall within a certain phase class.We might want to consider that our last standard model derivative is not yet complete. Dark particle emissions from black hole jets have a role in the end game.
LikeLike
If all dark paricles fall ito a class of condensate then relativity and quantum mechanics may agree on this?
LikeLike
Are particles that are paired in quantum entanglement continuiously exchanging qarks?
LikeLike
hello SolConsider that a quark information transfer only takes place because our inertial time function eliminates all other possibilities. This says that a quark exchange cannot be interupted. The next exchange can be prevented and entaglement broken. Some changes may only require one or two quarks. During quark information exchange both particles are entangled by the elimination of all other possibilities. For this reason no free quarks are found?Do I get ahead of ourselves?
LikeLike
Mapping Quark ConfinementI need to do some homework here:)IN the meantime I was focusing more on the dimenisonal aspect that the graviton gatherings implies to me. Tells us something about the energy in these locations in the bulk. When I say Graviton, any gathering that is quite dense would reveal what?If we looked in between these two quarks what would the energy reveal? Strong curvature would imply greater energy?
LikeLike
Mapping Quark ConfinementI need to do some homework here:)IN the meantime I was focusing more on the dimenisonal aspect that the graviton gatherings implies to me. Tells us something about the energy in these locations in the bulk. When I say Graviton, any gathering that is quite dense would reveal what?If we looked in between these two quarks what would the energy reveal? Strong curvature would imply greater energy?
LikeLike
A possible explanation currently gaining ground in theoretical circles is that the fundamental scale of gravity is not really up at the Planck scale, it just seems that way. According to this school of thought, what is actually happening is that gravity, uniquely among the forces, acts in extra dimensions. This means that much of the gravitational flux is invisible to us locked into our three dimensions of space and one of time. Consider, by analogy, what two-dimensional flatlanders would make of three-dimensional electromagnetism. To them, the flux lines of the force between two charges would appear to travel in their planar world, whereas in reality we know that most of the flux lines would spread out through a third dimension, thus weakening the force between the two charges.
LikeLike
A possible explanation currently gaining ground in theoretical circles is that the fundamental scale of gravity is not really up at the Planck scale, it just seems that way. According to this school of thought, what is actually happening is that gravity, uniquely among the forces, acts in extra dimensions. This means that much of the gravitational flux is invisible to us locked into our three dimensions of space and one of time. Consider, by analogy, what two-dimensional flatlanders would make of three-dimensional electromagnetism. To them, the flux lines of the force between two charges would appear to travel in their planar world, whereas in reality we know that most of the flux lines would spread out through a third dimension, thus weakening the force between the two charges.
LikeLike
If we looked in between these two quarks what would the energy reveal? Strong curvature would imply greater energy?Yes I think so. Just as relativity implies, very large energies occur only near the ends of an asymptote.The high energies due to curvature only becomes relavent in extreme curvature?Where would you place dark particles in the standerd model, if indeed this is appropriate to do so?
LikeLike
Graviton energy looks weak because it is distributed between dimensions, or because it is spread across a space-time much larger than what we observe within the frame of our Higg’s field of reference? Space time being pre-existant then it is much larger than the area distorted by the big bang and the subsequent expansion. If space-time is multidimensional in nature then graviton navigation does traverse dimensions. Areas with very little higg’s field distortion products exhibit graviton behavior differently? Do surface tensions exhibit to us as dimensional boundaries?
LikeLike
Where would you place dark particles in the standerd model, if indeed this is appropriate to do so?If a star collapses in upon itself and we saw this event played out again , in regards to the blackhole, I try to envision the whole event contained within a bubble. Now I am not sure if this is correct, but I do this because I see the relevance of the standard model production, based on the event starting at one point. In this case energy production from blackhole collpase would be the second phase of a structural collapse and this is where the energy/graviton is produced to reveal anti-matter? A Supersymmetrcial model where the temperature had to be reached for expansive properties to be disquise much as the planck epoch show in schematics.Now while these catstrophic events are unfolding wihtin the vacuum confine of the universe these events cannot go undetected for they leave a residual message in the form of graviton dispersement everywhere in the bulk.If we see graviton dispersement as indicators of curvature factors from gravitional wave production, then, such curvatures would also have a anti-part to play in relation to energy/graviton. dispersement into those extra dimensions?This view sends a strong message of what basis of reality these gravitons serve, and their place in the standard model as force carriers much like the photon is in regards to electromagnetism. This is a vital connection to what the events tell us and these photons are not separated from those events, yet in the bulk the graviton has taken the extra energy and disperse them, yet, they woud be revealling in context of strong graviton gatherings like the blackhole.So my views of the dimensional attributes are based in part on the scaling of graviton strength just outside of the reach of the photon, yet can travel endlessly. This grvaiton would be just outside of the bubble.Do surface tensions exhibit to us as dimensional boundaries? Einstein photoelctric would reveal scattter off the metal plate, but would be connected to it, while the graviton is the sound produced in the water. The sound would in analogy represent the dimensions.I would apply the sound values of high and low here in terms of graviton gathering and their strength in energy. Low sound would represent the boundaries as your question reveals(nodal points on a chaldni plate). Dvali example is a very good one.
LikeLike
Uisng the analogy of sound, I have compared these to grvaiational waves and the grvaiatons reveal the nodal points as I have shown in my prvious post.See this for how my views developed in this regard, and viewing Dvali’s statement and analogy one should come to the sense I have now garnered around these events ithe cosmo, and how the cyclical nature is revealled.If sound/energy/grvaions are sent into the bulk, a area teaming with grvaiaton dispersement then you can see how dynamical our universe is by turning things inside/out Klein bottle here for more introspective views, torus etc as part of a geometrical/topolgical tendency hidden from our views in dimensional attributes?You see?
LikeLike
Yes, I think so. You know more about graviton than I do. As to dark matter we know it exists due to gravitational lensing. My speculation here is that the energy plumes extending from galaxy centric black holes are due to particle emmisions. The plumes we observe are mass/energy swept into the energy stream by the particles that we do not see. Dark matter that we do not see exerts a rotational influence on galaxies. My speculation is that dark matter is a phase of matter that black hole compression forms. Just as suns produce phase transitions for matter. The reason dark holes produce dark matter instead of energy like suns do is key. In the extreme gravity environment of black holes the higg’s field is at maximum and cannot exhibit the fluxuations necessary for quark information exchange. Bose-E condensate is dark matter or WIMPS. They exhibit no property other than gravity. They have no structure to exhibit collisions or temperature. This is the lowest phase of mass/energy and cannot be changed again. Each particle of condensate is in too low an energy state to exhibit quark information exchange.The universe is cyclic in that all mass/energy eventually undergoes the phase transition to dark matter. While dark matter (mass condensate) exhibits gravitational lensing they cannot be clumped into groups causing large space-time distortions like mass. Eventually they must exit space-time via bubble nucleation that moves them dimensionally. They move across the suface tension barrier of space-time. They can only do this when there is no more mass/energy for them to react with gravitationally. When all of space-time is relaxed, with no distortions, the higg’s field is not exhibited anywhere. It is space-time pressure that keeps the compacted dimension of big bang eruption sealed. A new big bang erupts causing space-time pressure that again seals the compacted dimension until this mass/energy cycle can be processed into dark matter that moves into the expanded dimension beyond space-time. If time could not be compressed there would be no big bang. If time did not exert pressure from compression then there would be no dimensional seperation that translates as a universe changing phase in time. For this model to be correct space-time must pre-exist the big bang. The final phase of mass/energy must be condensate and there must be dimensional attributes that arise from time compression. Gravitons roam the bulk of all dimensions. Indeed they must be widely dispersed in the expanded dimension and heavily concentrated in the compacted dimension. They are the force carriers that shephard mass/energy from the compacted dimension, through our dimension of phase transitions, and into the expanded dimension as the final phase. The compacted dimension is the singularity of infinite compression. The universe is where compression expands. The expanded dimension is the singularity of infinite size where there is no compression.Your thoughts?
LikeLike
G -> H -> … -> SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) -> SU(3) x U(1)->…-> (Condensate)(Singularity of big bang)->(enrgy distributions as phase transition due to electroweak interactions)-> (singularity as Bose E condensate)The smalest energy state of mass possible would interact with gravitons but do not possess electroweak characteristics. They are condensate not due to temperature but because they do not exhibit temperature information. Nor do they exhibit solidity or quark information. The lowest energy state possible exhibits gravity. They do not posses enough energy to even exhibit solidity so they slide right through each other. They cannot undergo any further phase transitions. The only string vibrating in their bubble is the graviton.
LikeLike
Hello SolI think that in those first three minutes there was a single local string speaking to a local one dimensionality. Energy of such high level that it was a group of self contained one dimensional particles.At the plank scale the bubbles lost energy to vibrations in the graviton string that is non local. This decrease in energy caused the one string to break into a distribution of strings giving rise to distributed componant spin states of energy that speak to the physical properties.As a result of phase transitions, from the entropy pressure of time, the energy is eventually transferred to the non local string. Again there is a one dimensionality of the bubble around the non local graviton string. The only physical property of one dimensional dark energy is gravity. It no longer has enough energy to even react with the higg’s field its presence generates.Because dark energy does generate a higg’s field its presence creates an influence on higher energy (higher dimensionality by strings) phases of bubbles.It will tend to form a taurus around mass/energy. Thus is the entropy action between bubbles on non local strings and bubbles encapsulating both local and the non local string.Do you see the symmetry of this? It is a symmetry that I have always glimpsed. You gave me the language and guidence to finally see it a little clearer and express it, I hope?(local one dimensionality)->(local multi dimensional bubbles around non local higg’s field or graviton strings)-{Higg’s field dimensional bubbles transfer to graviton string}->(bubbles of one dimensional non local on graviton string)
LikeLike
Local one dimensional strings form bubbles that have solidity and temperature due to vibration. At the plank scale energy transfers to non local graviton string and energy distributes into electroweak components due to the higg’s field, graviton vibration generates.Compressed to the plank scale with only non local string vibrations, energy is in the lowest phase. Somewhere in a black hole even solidity and temperature transfer from local string to graviton.I think I should stop now and await your thoughts?
LikeLike
Hi barry,I am having a difficult time getting my brain to work properly. Commitments and being pulled in many directions don’t help.What is important is to be lead into the world of higher dimensions and how would we do this? Some do not like this inference, and have moved it to subjects of spiritual significance?I think this is what has happened to my views when I look at what we are capable of envisioning in our minds and the actions we take in life could be weighted in these dimensions. I hope that make sense.But there is a true scientific explanation that I am trying tocapture, as well as explainthese abilities of mind to connect to these higher dimensions. Is this a incorrect view in your eyes?HyperSpace : A Scientific OdysseyMichio KakuThis trick is easily extended. For example, if we generalize the theory to N dimensions, then the N dimensional gravitational field can be split-up into the following pieces (see fig. 5). Now, out pops a generalization of the electromagnetic field, called the “Yang-Mills field,” which is known to describe the nuclear forces. The nuclear forces, therefore, may be viewed as vibrations of higher dimensional space. Simply put, by adding more dimensions, we are able to describe more forces. Similarly, by adding higher dimensions and further embellishing this approach (with something called “supersymmetry), we can explain the entire particle “zoo” that has been discovered over the past thirty years, with bizarre names like quarks, neutrinos, muons, gluons, etc. Although the mathematics required to extend the idea of Kaluza has reached truly breathtaking heights, startling even professional mathematicians, the basic idea behind unification remains surprisingly simple: the forces of nature can be viewed as vibrations in higher dimensional space.
LikeLike
Hi barry,I am having a difficult time getting my brain to work properly. Commitments and being pulled in many directions don\’t help.What is important is to be lead into the world of higher dimensions and how would we do this? Some do not like this inference, and have moved it to subjects of spiritual significance?I think this is what has happened to my views when I look at what we are capable of envisioning in our minds and the actions we take in life could be weighted in these dimensions. I hope that make sense.But there is a true scientific explanation that I am trying tocapture, as well as explainthese abilities of mind to connect to these higher dimensions. Is this a incorrect view in your eyes?HyperSpace : A Scientific OdysseyMichio KakuThis trick is easily extended. For example, if we generalize the theory to N dimensions, then the N dimensional gravitational field can be split-up into the following pieces (see fig. 5). Now, out pops a generalization of the electromagnetic field, called the \”Yang-Mills field,\” which is known to describe the nuclear forces. The nuclear forces, therefore, may be viewed as vibrations of higher dimensional space. Simply put, by adding more dimensions, we are able to describe more forces. Similarly, by adding higher dimensions and further embellishing this approach (with something called \”supersymmetry), we can explain the entire particle \”zoo\” that has been discovered over the past thirty years, with bizarre names like quarks, neutrinos, muons, gluons, etc. Although the mathematics required to extend the idea of Kaluza has reached truly breathtaking heights, startling even professional mathematicians, the basic idea behind unification remains surprisingly simple: the forces of nature can be viewed as vibrations in higher dimensional space.
LikeLike
Barry,I will be taking a break from our exchanges for a while.There is a lot of good information out there for you to ponder over.Physics forum is a good place for your more important questions. The Kaku link in previous post will take you there.
LikeLike
Barry,I will be taking a break from our exchanges for a while.There is a lot of good information out there for you to ponder over.Physics forum is a good place for your more important questions. The Kaku link in previous post will take you there.
LikeLike
Hello SolYes I think so. What is important here is that our model completes the standerd model. The unification comes together in that phase transitions can be described by quantum mechanics, relativity, strings, or bubble dimensionality. The termonology becomes interchangeble at unification. Each is descriptive of some aspect of a what cannot be described by a single view. When I look at the way our model comes together I see a lot of loose ends of each theory that come together.Our new standerd model can be written in the notation of each method.We need to give our model a name and organize our discussion into a coherent final form. Critical review will ascertain its merits.Do you agree?
LikeLike
Hello SolWe must have made our last two posts at about the same time. Your assistance in helping me to understanding was invaluable. I am going to organize our exchanges into a coherent form for revue. I will explore the links you suggest. Do you wish to revue my evaluation of our efforts when I finalize it?regards with sincere gratitude
LikeLike
As a result of our discussion I have outlined the energy metrics for a cyclical universe. I call it the superfluid model of dimensional energy density. Space-time scaler metrics distribute particle energy into dimensional attributes of properties. E(energy)/S(unit Space-time) = D(density) = Di(time) + Dg(graviton scaler of gravity) + Dp(thermodynamics at planck scale temperature and solidity) + De(electroweak emergent from solidity exhibiting torsion)Di = quarks, Di + Dg = dark matter, Di + Dg + Dp + De = mass, Di + Dp + De = photons.De distributes into SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) -> SU(3) x U(1)I am presenting this at http://www.freewebs.com/superfluid/index.htmI would value your thoughts as our dialogue directed my thinking on this.
LikeLike