Category Archives: Branes

What a Good String Theorist Should Know?

Posted on April 22, 2006 by PlatoHagel

Arthur MillerEinstein and Schrödinger never fully accepted the highly abstract nature of Heisenberg’s quantum mechanics, says Miller. They agreed with Galileo’s assertion that “the book of nature is written in mathematics”, but they also realized the power of using visual … Continue reading →

Posted in Branes, Bubbles, Compactification, Dirac, Einstein, Foundation, Gauss, General Relativity, geometries, Gravity, Hooft, M Theory, Mathematics, Quantum Gravity, String Theory, Supersymmetry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

All Particles of the Standard Model and Beyond

Posted on March 4, 2006 by PlatoHagel

Polchinski Elected Member Of National Academy of Sciences Polchinski’s discovery of D-branes and their properties is, according to the Academy citation, “one of the most important insights in 30 years of work on string theory.” Can I tell a little … Continue reading →

Posted in Branes, CERN, Collision, Genus Figures, Gluon, Holonomy, IceCube, John Bachall, M Theory, Particles, Pierre Auger, Quark Gluon PLasma, Standard model, Strangelets, String Theory, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Intersection of D Branes

Posted on February 14, 2006 by PlatoHagel

I’m not going to try and kid you with “this stuff,” as it is extremely beyond anything that any of us mere mortal can understand. So, if such a thought would be to simplify, then how would such thinking be … Continue reading →

Posted in AdS/CFT, Black Holes, Branes, Cosmic Strings, Earth, Emergence, Entropy, geometries, Gravity, M Theory, Membrane, Neutrinos, Particles, Quantum Gravity, String Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Second of Five Lagrangian Equilibrium Points

Posted on December 14, 2005 by PlatoHagel

The more I thought about it, the more it made sense that one image we’re getting, is quite different(lensing) from the image that is behind the brane? The idea of brane collision from steinhardt and turok perspective, created this space … Continue reading →

Posted in Branes, Collision, dark energy, dark matter, Dirac, Earth, lagrangian, Photon, Satellites, Strange Matter, Sun, Time Travel | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Foundations of Mathematic

Posted on November 28, 2005 by PlatoHagel

Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beautya beauty cold and austere, like that of sculpture, without appeal to any part of our weaker nature, without the gorgeous trappings of painting or music, yet sublimely pure, and capable … Continue reading →

Posted in Art, Brain, Branes, Concepts, Game Theory, geometries, John Nash, M Theory, Mathematics, Music, Toposense, WunderKammern | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 25 Comments

Main Stream Breakthrough on Cosmic Variance

Posted on November 1, 2005 by PlatoHagel

linked in title of article of same name, by Sean Carroll A Randall/Sundrum view of the cosmos The trick in this picture supplied by Sean is to look at the ideas of gravitonic concentrations, as these would be leading to … Continue reading →

Posted in Branes, Cosmic Strings, Liminocentric, M Theory, Membrane, Microstate Blackholes, Toposense | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What are those Quantum Microstates

Posted on October 18, 2005 by PlatoHagel

Now two points occupy my mind that hold questions as to what and how such counting can be done in terms of geometric propensity, that would allow these geometries into topological states. First point is: Lubos Motl said: We need … Continue reading →

Posted in Black Holes, Boltzmann, Branes, Collision, Entropy, General Relativity, geometries, Gravity, Laughlin, M Theory, Microscopic Blackholes, Microstate Blackholes, Peter Steinberg, planck, Quantum Gravity, String Theory, Supersymmetry, Symmetry, Symmetry Breaking | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Art and Science

Posted on October 15, 2005 by PlatoHagel

This is going to be quite the blog entry because as little a response might have been from Clifford’s links to artistic imagery and it’s relation to science. I definitely have more to say. So being short of time, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Art, Branes, Colour of Gravity, Curvature Parameters, Dimension, Einstein, Gauss, geometries, Graviton, Gravity, Heisenberg, HENRI POINCARE, Inverse Square Law, Non Euclidean, Polytopes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Some Distant Bounding Surface

Posted on October 11, 2005 by PlatoHagel

I mean when I referred to fifth dimensional views you know that the computer screen includes not only it’s functionability in relation to science, but adds that bit of extended flavour to model construction we call imaging right? a) Compactifying … Continue reading →

Posted in Black Holes, Branes, Brian Greene, Compactification, Cosmic Strings, Cosmology, Dimension, General Relativity, Gravity, imagery, Intuition, Lisa Randall, Mathematics, Membrane, Quantum Gravity, String Theory, Sun, Symmetry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

CFT and the Tomato Soup Can

Posted on September 15, 2005 by PlatoHagel

As always, the layman trying to develope the mathematical views?:) Greg Kuperberg on Sep 15th, 2005 at 12:11 pm Conformal maps of the Earth are a great introduction to complex analysis. If you identify the Earth with the Riemann sphere, … Continue reading →

Posted in Branes, Dimension, Earth, Einstein, General Relativity, Grace, Grace Satellite, Gravity, Kaluza, Loop Quantum, Mathematics, Quantum Gravity, Stephen Hawking, String Theory, Tomato Soup | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment