Category Archives: M Theory

Comprehending New Physics?

Posted on April 27, 2006 by PlatoHagel

Scientists May Soon Have Evidence for Exotic Predictions of String Theory issued by Northeaster University “String theory and other possibilities can distort the relative numbers of ‘down’ and ‘up’ neutrinos,” said Jonathan Feng, associate professor in the Department of Physics … Continue reading →

Posted in astronomy, Black Holes, Complexity, Intuition, M Theory, Microscopic Blackholes, Neutrinos, Particles, String Theory, Sun | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What a Good String Theorist Should Know?

Posted on April 22, 2006 by PlatoHagel

Arthur MillerEinstein and Schrödinger never fully accepted the highly abstract nature of Heisenberg’s quantum mechanics, says Miller. They agreed with Galileo’s assertion that “the book of nature is written in mathematics”, but they also realized the power of using visual … Continue reading →

Posted in Branes, Bubbles, Compactification, Dirac, Einstein, Foundation, Gauss, General Relativity, geometries, Gravity, Hooft, M Theory, Mathematics, Quantum Gravity, String Theory, Supersymmetry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Purpose of the Compton Lecture Series

Posted on April 20, 2006 by PlatoHagel

April 8The 63rd Compton Lecture Series, 2006 through June 3, 2006, 11:00 a.m. Sean at cosmic variance point to this series of lectures that are being presented each year and in this series the entitled is called, “String Theory: With … Continue reading →

Posted in Cosmic Strings, Fermi, General Relativity, geometries, Gravity, Leonard Mlodinow, M Theory, Mathematics, Particles, Quantum Gravity, String Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ways IN which To Percieve Landscape?

Posted on March 20, 2006 by PlatoHagel

What a Cosmologist Wants from a String Theorist? Emotion versus Reason? 3.1 As Cytowic notes, Plato and Socrates viewed emotion and reason as in a kind of struggle, one in which it was vitally important for reason to win out. … Continue reading →

Posted in Alchemists, Cosmology, Emotion, Entropy, Flowers, geometries, Induction, Landscape, M Theory, Mathematics, Nothing, Particles, Socratic Method, Sound, Standard model, String Theory, Sun, Susskind, Sylvester Surfaces, WunderKammern | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The center of our UNiverse and the Arrow of time

Posted on March 12, 2006 by PlatoHagel

About ISCAP Mission At the energy scales characteristic of the universe’s earliest moments, one can no longer approximate matter and energy using an ideal gas formulation; instead, one must use quantum field theory, and at the highest of energies, one … Continue reading →

Posted in Black Holes, Cosmology, Deep Play, geometries, Gravity, M Theory, Quantum Gravity, Standard model, Strange Matter, String Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Looking for the Kernel of Truth

Posted on March 10, 2006 by PlatoHagel

Wikimedia Commons How developmental perspective is created and endures, for those of us who are not to well informed as to the nature of specific information on the internet. How can it grow? How can we stay better informed? Kernel … Continue reading →

Posted in Blog Developers, Computers, Creativity, Internet, Laughlin, M Theory, String Theory | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Have we seen (strange) quark matter?

Posted on March 7, 2006 by PlatoHagel

Well the very idea that such a thing could exist, has been part of the evolving information I had been going through. To be lead to the understanding, of what new Physics would emerge fromm cosmological and collidial events. That … Continue reading →

Posted in Cerenkov Radiation, Concepts, Condense Matter, Condensed Matter, Cosmic Rays, Cosmic Strings, Gluon, IceCube, Laughlin, M Theory, Mathematics, Microstate Blackholes, Neutrinos, Particles, Peter Steinberg, Quark Gluon PLasma, Quark Stars, Standard model, Strange Matter, Strangelets, Superfluids | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

All Particles of the Standard Model and Beyond

Posted on March 4, 2006 by PlatoHagel

Polchinski Elected Member Of National Academy of Sciences Polchinski’s discovery of D-branes and their properties is, according to the Academy citation, “one of the most important insights in 30 years of work on string theory.” Can I tell a little … Continue reading →

Posted in Branes, CERN, Collision, Genus Figures, Gluon, Holonomy, IceCube, John Bachall, M Theory, Particles, Pierre Auger, Quark Gluon PLasma, Standard model, Strangelets, String Theory, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Nature in Analog Models

Posted on February 25, 2006 by PlatoHagel

Plato: “For everyone, as I think, must see that astronomy compels the soul to look upwards and leads us from this world to another.” Oh! how complete our world view would be, that I have moved quickly to the very … Continue reading →

Posted in Analogies, astronomy, Black Holes, CERN, Complexity, Concepts, Cosmic Strings, Creativity, Entanglement, General Relativity, Graviton, Gravity, Laval Nozzle, Loop Quantum, M Theory, Music, Nothing, Particles, planck, Quantum Gravity, Quark Stars, Sound, Standard model, String Theory, Susskind, Time Travel | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

More on Dual Nature of Blackhole

Posted on February 21, 2006 by PlatoHagel

In some theories, microscopic black holes may be produced in particle collisions that occur when very-high-energy cosmic rays hit particles in our atmosphere. These mini-black-holes would decay into ordinary particles in a tiny fraction of a second and would be … Continue reading →

Posted in astrophysics, Black Holes, Collision, Cosmic Rays, Cosmic Strings, Cosmology, Einstein, Gauss, General Relativity, Higgs, lagrangian, LHC, M Theory, Microscopic Blackholes, Particles, Peter Steinberg, planck, Quarks, String Theory, Taylor | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment