In regards to the QGP(Quark Gluon Plasma) I thought such a creation important from the ideas of what happens in assessing any beginning?
<a href="http://qd.typepad.com/5/2005/03/public_service_.html" target=_blank title="Public Service Announcement: Black Holes @ RHIC
-March 17 2005-Peter Steinberg”>
This thought arose from what was revealled in terms of “Microstate blackhole” production and the circumstances from such gold ion collisions.
If we are lead experimentally to such a place, then what may we say of “reductionistic circumstances” and it’s relation to the beginning of the universe?
In my GRand Quantum conjecture, such thinking to have established the origins of “quantum perception” along with the understanding of GR and it’s curvatures?
Who would of thought such “an application” and ignore what is driving the perspective around blackhole hole creation? It’s “microstate properties?”
This was a field theory that lived on a circle, which means it has one spatial dimension and one time dimension. We derived the fact that the quantum states of the black hole could be represented as the quantum states of this one-plus-one dimensional quantum field theory, and then we counted the states of this theory and found they exactly agreed with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy.
I pointed out “Strominger” in this case to help direct the “existance of perception” simultaneously of what is being related, not only in our early universe, but from the understanding of what “quantum perception” is doing in relation to reductionistcally driven physics?
Such a “relation and assumption of microstate blackholes,” helps to direct supersymmetrical ideas, to what the “collapse of the blackhole is doing” in terms of the creation of this quark Gluon plasma state.
Are they the same in terms of what happens in the cosmological blackhole and what is created in the collider?
Ask a Astrophysicist
The Question:Can you explain to me what quantum gravity is, and if so how does it relate to black holes?
A quantum theory of gravity would involve particles passing ‘gravitons’ back and forth among themselves. This quantum theory would probably be a more accurate description of gravity, and might be accurate enough to describe the extreme conditions found at the center of a black hole.
They both from what I have understood so far would have needed to account for the “classifications” Strominger had pointed out for us?
What is Blackhole Entrophy?
Suppose we have a box filled with gas of some type of molecule called M. The temperature of that gas in that box tells us the average kinetic energy of those vibrating molecules of gas. Each molecule as a quantum particle has quantized energy states, and if we understand the quantum theory of those molecules, theorists can count up the available quantum microstates of those molecules and get some number. The entropy is the logarithm of that number.
When it was discovered that black holes can decay by quantum processes, it was also discovered that black holes seem to have the thermodynamic properties of temperature and entropy. The temperature of the black hole is inversely proportional to its mass, so the black hole gets hotter and hotter as it decays.
One would have had to conclude that the “energy states” are very importnat here, as well as the nature, and the way such a process is related in terms of those reductionsitic energy derivations?
Who is Boltzman? What is Chaos?
In the presence of gravitational field (or, in general, of any potential field) the molecules of gas are acted upon by the gravitational forces. As a result the “concentration of gas molecules” is not the same at various points of the space and described by Boltzman distribution law:
The “energy and decay(gravitonically considered and extended from the implication of GR)” have to be reconciled in our understanding of the blackhole, in regards to the nature of the microstate blackhole perceptions? The “evidentry” particle creations exemplify the energy distributions?