“Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love. Albert Einstein”
Of course I look a Einstein’s statement here and I am perplexed as one might distance them self from the subject of gravity to see that such a comparison as I list below can run contradictory to Einstein’s rule? But when considering the context of “emotive valence” as a subject worthy of the innovative materialist design products, I consider the physiological application that emotive valence might have in understanding our world today.
Quantum chemistry is a branch of chemistry whose primary focus is the application of quantum mechanics in physical models and experiments of chemical systems. It is also called molecular quantum mechanics.
When one moves through the subject of quantum biology one is lead toward the chemistry of life so as to see this trend toward understanding the conversion process that can take place as to the quantum effects as seen in quantum biology.
The science and history of the minimal length has now been covered in a recent book by Amit Hagar:
Discrete or Continuous? The Quest for Fundamental Length in Modern Physics
Cambridge University Press (2014)
The Planck limits may cause a researcher to ask what particulars may be seen within reason toward the larger picture? If something is discrete in its measure then what would such particularization mean in terms of a wave?
Several questions about consciousness must be resolved in order to acquire a full understanding of it. These questions include, but are not limited to, whether being conscious could be wholly described in physical terms, such as the aggregation of neural processes in the brain. If consciousness cannot be explained exclusively by physical events, it must transcend the capabilities of physical systems and require an explanation of nonphysical means. For philosophers who assert that consciousness is nonphysical in nature, there remains a question about what outside of physical theory is required to explain consciousness. See: The Hard Problem of Consciousness
Unification of gravity and the electrical forces may have some profound insight as too, the unification possibility that such a design could bring an understanding of logic and emotive forces. I believe, which must be brought to bear on understanding the whole being/body? Understanding each individual’s Truth. An Effective Field Theory of Emotion?
Gravimetry is the measurement of the strength of a gravitational field.
The conversion process was self explanatory in terms of the energy consideration as to the particularity of the universe? So we look at the world in different way.
(The CIE 1931 colour space chromaticity diagram with wavelengths in nanometers. The colours depicted depend on the colour space of the device on which the image is viewed.) International Commission on Illumination
Consider this for a moment. What may be defined as dimensional attributes, is a conversion process of the “emotive application” that I am moving toward, may have some has relevance in the affective decisions we have? I’ve based this on how we can see the universe in terms of Lagrangian?
|A contour plot of the effective potential due to gravity and the centrifugal force of a two-body system in a rotating frame of reference. The arrows indicate the gradients of the potential around the five Lagrange points—downhill toward them (red) or away from them (blue). Counterintuitively, the L4 and L5 points are the high points of the potential. At the points themselves these forces are balanced.|
On a classical scale its influence regarding the three body problem, allows one to see “variations of the gravity field” between these bodies?
For fun apply a color scale to this view? You use a “configuration box” that if applied to some color scale has value in that “such points within the relationship of the three body detail aspects of the nature of this gravity?” So think about this comparison for a moment.
We know that colour is a psychophysical experience of an observer which changes from observer to observer and is therefore impossible to replicate absolutely. In order to quantify colour in meaningful terms we must be able to measure or represent the three attributes that together give a model of colour perception. i.e. light, object and the eye. All these attributes have been standardised by the CIE or Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. The colours of the clothes we wear and the textiles we use in our homes must be monitored to ensure that they are correct and consistent. Colour measurement is therefore essential to put numbers to colour in order to remove physical samples and the interpretation of results.See: Colour measuring equipment